So what do you think?

With all the hype around the new Twilight films (dear God kill me now), me and my mates have had a bit of a debate.

Which film has the better vampire/werewolf story line?
Van Helsing or the Twilight Saga?

What do you guys reckon, I just wanted to see the general opinion..

excuses - so what do you think?

  • SuDoku
  • November 26, 2009, 3:23 am
You might be interested


Reply Attach
  • 3

    Really... You actually think there is a valid argument in that? Van Helsing is to Twilight what Bruce Lee is to Spongebob.

    • Dawn
    • March 5, 2010, 3:08 am
  • 2

    dracula 1992 2 - so what do you think?

    • juniper
    • October 22, 2010, 4:00 am
  • 1

    Avoid both of them...

    • Dannyl
    • November 26, 2009, 3:56 am
    i agree and can't remember the last "great" vampire movie. maybe interview with a vampire but thats all i can think of.
    - johnecash October 22, 2010, 5:35 am
  • 1

    Van Helsing... Twilight is for 16 year old girls...

  • 1

    Van Helsing... Twilight is for people who can't think...

    • ember
    • February 17, 2010, 11:11 am
  • 1

    Avoid both of them but Van Helsing is better

    • peace
    • March 5, 2010, 2:01 am
  • 1

    i thought you said bruce willis for a second... i was about to flip shit. but then i noticed it was bruce lee, and it thought to myself "fair enough"

    cool story huh

  • 1

    Van Helsing. In twilight vampires are a bunch of pale fags and the warewolfs are douchebag fags. In van helsing the Dracula is badass and the vamp chicks are psycho. the warewolfs don't try to butfuck you when they fight and the storyline is bearable.

  • 1

    twilight is the biggest pile of shit going. there's no point to it. its more for girls that don't have a grip on reality and live in cloud cuckoo land. so i think that Van Helsing is better

  • 1

    while i do agree that van helsing was better but... the best of the two is like placing first place in the special olympics. the only real way to win is to not be in the race at all by not being special. both movies are "special" in their own unique way. neither of them is Citizen Kain or Apocalypse Now.

  • 1

    I'd have to say Underworld has the best of recent times. However, within the question you asked, most definitely Van Helsing. The "vampires" in the Twilight Saga are just disgraceful. They are apparently made of stone/ice which is false. Vampires are still human and have the same body make-up as a normal mortal being. They aren't any different other than the fact that their heart no longer beats making their blood stagnant and is why they have a pale blueish tint. The "Werewolves" aren't even that. They are actually retarded shape-shifters that only know how to shift into that of a wolf. It's kinda sad you if ask me.

    My mate came up with the best response to that..

    'How can Edward and Bella have a baby, if Edward has no blood to get it up?'
    - SuDoku October 23, 2010, 3:14 am
    Well, apparently he is made of stone, so wouldn't he always be "rock hard"?
    - CallMeGoogle October 23, 2010, 9:20 am
    That must be painful. For both parties. But isn't stone cold? Therefore, his 'seed' couldn't live because it would be too cold in his non-existent nether-regions?
    - SuDoku October 23, 2010, 9:41 am
    His 'seed' is actually glitter. And glitter can survive everywhere because glitter is
    - CallMeGoogle October 23, 2010, 12:49 pm
Related Posts