"if this post is not a rabbit, then it is a paradox"

at first i didn't understand this, but as you think about it it's interesting.

street credit goes my friend Bennitt for showing me this

  • dreed34
  • December 23, 2010, 6:05 pm
You might be interested


Reply Attach
  • 2

    confused8 - paradox

    I don't get it

    • Pharmon
    • December 24, 2010, 12:24 am
  • 2

    I... Don't... Wait... What?

    My brain...

    • SuDoku
    • December 24, 2010, 12:31 pm
  • 2

    This post is OBVIOUSLY a rabbit since the universe hasn't blown up yet.

    • Disco
    • December 24, 2010, 5:29 pm
  • 1

    this post is a post

    but it is also not a rabbit. Making it a paradox
    - dreed34 December 23, 2010, 6:18 pm
    the moon isn't a rabbit either, so does that make the moon a paradox.
    - thekitkatkid December 23, 2010, 6:49 pm
    The statement itself is the paradox, not the actual object in question. But according to that statement yes, it is.
    - dreed34 December 23, 2010, 6:57 pm
    dude, it's a post
    - thekitkatkid December 23, 2010, 7:07 pm
    so it's a paradox too...
    - dreed34 December 23, 2010, 7:10 pm
    im so confused!
    - 24paperwings December 24, 2010, 5:50 pm
  • 1

    dont take things so literally thekitkatkid, if it pleases you can change it to "statement" not post. The idea is about how the statement is a paradox, and the thought process behind it. So basically you are focusing on the wrong idea.
    so consider it
    "if this statement is not a rabbit, then it is a paradox"

    • Bennitt
    • December 23, 2010, 7:19 pm
  • 1

    This post is not a rabbit therefore it is not a rabbit. But it is not a paradox although the statement claims that if it is not a rabbit then it is a paradox and it is not a rabbit but is it a paradox? I don't thinks its a paradox or a rabbit but is it even a post?

    Theres your paradox thought of the day. Its all a mindfuck that goes back to the same thing.

Related Posts