Battlefield 3 VS Modern Warfare 3


    Views: 18,460
  • DarkicoN13
  • September 5, 2011, 10:51 am
You might be interested


Reply Attach
  • 12

    mw3vsbf3 - battlefield 3 vs modern warfare 3

    • Disco
    • September 5, 2011, 11:06 am
  • 8

    im gunna go with frogger

    - bufus101 September 5, 2011, 1:30 pm
  • 6

    i don't know why everyone's bitching about how much better either game is, i honestly don't care. I'll be getting both anyway and the one i like more will be played more, simple enough. No need for the shitstorm.

    - jedi870 September 5, 2011, 3:19 pm
  • 2

    Inb4 framerate kids - Battlefield 3 surpasses MW3 in all aspects, scale, destruction, team work, graphics, structured online, enjoyable.

  • 2

    tf2logo - battlefield 3 vs modern warfare 3

    mother fucking mini gun
    TF2 Heavy Wallpaper by conju

    • BEASTY
    • September 5, 2011, 1:26 pm
    Good argument sir. +1
    - ReapersSniper September 7, 2011, 3:10 am
  • 2

    i just wanna say that BF3 is not the most popular game i know but thats all CoD is. Its a name, like when buying speakers Bose is good but not the best more expensive just because the name slapped on it. BF, lets see a camper in a corner with his tent pitched and a fire going, all it takes is one death from a squadmate to say hey there is a guy there behind the wall. Me, Oh alright whip out and RPG or Grenade launcher and blow his happy ass up and the neighboors if i felt like it. Sniping isnt camping like ThelFrost says, in CoD all o see is snipers running around doing flips and shit shooting me from the hip and call it sniping, In BF a sniper can pick my head off at 500 yards i say damn he's pretty good at that, and life goes on. If i was in a war and i had a Rifle i would be as far back as i could hit a person and shoot not run gun ho into a firefight, i would be the idiot who got shot thinking it was CoD trying to be cool. Killstreaks in CoD are Understandable but get you 100's of kills in like twenty seconds, In BF ive gotten well over a 80 kills in a game with no kill streaks no vehicles used all i did was play as a squad medic and revive my people and gunned down whoever came at us. In CoD no one knows how to work as a team to take an objective or take out a flying death machine that is demolishing your team unless your playing with people you know. In BF i can jump into any random game hey see a tank rolling my way shooting splody shit at me, i spot it out and then all of a sudden 6 guys are firing tracer darts and RPG's at teh damn thing and its gone in no time. So you can take CoD and shove it up your a** and feel good about yourself for playing a game that hasnt changed a bit in the last six or so games besides looking a bit better. BF3 completely new Built up with frostbite 2 and ant, MW3 same damn thing as MW2 just a little touched up and a new campaign. As yall can tell BF3 is my choice and i needed to let tnat one out.

    *starts slow clap*
    - xxkisamexx September 6, 2011, 6:31 pm
    Wow, someone's on their period
    - JonnymusPrime September 6, 2011, 8:49 pm
    So your basically trying to compare the two by using your own experiences with teammates and your delusional view of how everyone works together in BF. The reason vehicles get destroyed so fast in BF is because A. Most kits have abilities/weapons to destroy them. B. There are more people in a BF game than in a CoD game. Oh and you can get over 100 kills in a CoD game without killstreaks in less than 10 minutes, you can get over 300 in less than ten minutes using chopper gunner and gunship. Also don't talk about killstreaks in CoD because it is one of the things that MAKE CoD, just like I don't diss vehicles in BF because they are a huge part of the game.
    - ThelFrost September 7, 2011, 4:44 pm
    by spawn camping and with killstreaks thry usually sit directly over the spawn and it just turns into sitting there and spawning and dying for 60 seconds while that one guy with the chopper gunner racks up kill for that nuke or in headquarters its worse, i can play games of me just dying while i get spawn trapped or be the one spawn trapping the other team because of there ridiculously small maps
    - TheEldestHambone September 7, 2011, 6:56 pm
    Done talking with idiots that know less about battlefield than they do about call of duty.
    - ThelFrost September 8, 2011, 1:42 pm
  • 1

    at least we remembered to put bullets in the magazine.

  • 1

    every game has its problem but i base the game on what it does and not if it has more campers. there is bound to be some dumbshit camping noob who thinks he is the shit just for killing like 25 or people and getting a nuke or sniping in battlefield but battlefield has better graphics more realistic maps and a completely destructible environment. and ive played cod and still do but im looking forward to battlefield even more

  • 1

    I play the game for the game... Not what's in it, but for the feel of the gameplay, the style. Not how it looks. Every game has a different feel of gameplay in it, and that's why I play CoD.

  • 1

    Battlefield 3 for sure. MW3 looks fun and all, but I was given MW2 as a gift and that is the only reason I own it. I have owned three BF games and Loved two of them with a passion. BF 2142 was amazing and BC2 was pretty dang fun, while BF 2 was amazingly tactical.

    Battlefield 3 is on my shopping list.

  • 1

    Started pissing myself when someone mentioned sold copies of Black Ops being no.1 - Go online on Xbox 360 these days and look at the players online in the corner - Yesterday at 6pm (around peak times) there was a grand total of 150,000 odd online. Real good considering it sold so many copies yet no one wants to play it.

  • 0

    Well the thing is CoD is 100% better than Battlefield, let me show you.

    The biggest advantage that CoD has over BF is that new players can come in and enjoy the game and get acclimated to the game while the experienced players remain dominant allowing for both good players and bad players to have fun. BF on the other hand takes a while to get used to and therefore less attractive to new players.

    Another reason is the competitive gaming scene. A huge advantage CoD has over BF is that it is a better competitive game. The game modes are better based for quick and short matches with simple objectives that suit the MLG playstyle. Also, CoD is also undeniably faster paced than BF. BF on the otherhand is neither quick nor has fast action and is dominated by camping.

    Last reason is the fact that more people prefer CoD. Battlefied Bad Company 2 has sold 5 million copies so far making it a hugely popular game. However MW2 has sold over 25 million copies and 12.5 million have bought the DLCs. But MW2 is no longer the best selling game ever, oh wait another CoD stole the spotlight, yup you guessed it, CoD BO. Black ops alone sold 7 million on the first day of release, thats 2 million more than BF BC 2 had in its entire career.

    Good Game.

    there is nowhere to camp in battlefield.....everything can be destroyed ive tried it....and i prefer battlefield over CoD less kids more fun lots less range better hit detection big huge maps and most of all vehicles....
    - xxkisamexx September 5, 2011, 7:05 pm
    tbh you sound really dumb in the first paragraph. because when i was a noob at bf i could acctuly do something with out gegtting shot the fuck up. on cod i couldnt do crap i would take 5 steps and get hit by fucking grenade or getting shot down by 3 guys. and the tanks make it fun because you can actually do shit as a noob in one
    in your second paragraph there is camping in bf but not near as much as cod. i admit there is a faster pace but i get better adrenaline rushes.
    and for your last paragraph look at some videos for bf3 its in pre alpha and looks 10 times better then cod.
    - castlewarsisawsome September 5, 2011, 7:16 pm
    Don't get me wrong I still like both, And I have both on a pre order I just found the picture funny. And as it stands I am more excited for MW3 then BF3. (Probably because of CoD XP)
    - DarkicoN13 September 5, 2011, 11:55 pm
    Syke... BF is all one big camp fest. This is due to the fact that most people wanna snipe and you can't use the sniper as effective while on the move than you can while sitting in the trees a mile away taking shots and calling in mortars... Oh and don't joke about hit detection, even as shitty as BO hit detection is, its still better than BF's...
    - ThelFrost September 6, 2011, 3:26 am
    You cant even make the argument that CoD has more camping than BF, its just plain retarded. Ever play a domination game on Shipment? Nuketown? Rust? There is no camping.

    I can get 100 kills in CoD in 6 minutes. The most a professional BF player can get would be 30.

    Good game.

    P.S. The customization in CoD is 30x better than BF.
    - ThelFrost September 6, 2011, 3:30 am
    what happnes to trees? blown up what happens to trees in cod....nothing
    - xxkisamexx September 6, 2011, 2:34 pm
    u can get over 100 kills because of kill streaks how do you jus pull a laptop out of you ass in the middle of war to call in and control a missle better yet how can you call in a nuke in the nick of time and im not even gonna ask how in BO dogs jus happen to be waiting to get called in
    - xxkisamexx September 6, 2011, 2:37 pm
    a bf player- "OH looky here! a nice cozey hole to camp in!"
    a cod player- "OH looky here! a nice little corner to camp in!"

    cod- "HOLY FUCK AN AC-130!"

    stop complaining about which game is better, both have shit hit detection, both have campers and vehicle spam. both have class customization now, both take skill to play.....also EA ceo said that cod should rot from the core, activision says that one should play both games. the reason i dont like EA because they only support their own games
    - gamma935 September 6, 2011, 2:47 pm
    youre forgetting the rage when a person almost has an ac-130 and gets killed.... and can be found when camping thanks to spotting so caminping is out of the question
    - xxkisamexx September 6, 2011, 3:30 pm
    If your saying CoD is unrealistic while saying BF is totally realistic then please actually know something about both videogames. BF is completely unrealistic just like CoD, if you want realistic go join the army.

    P.S. Killstreaks are what make CoD so much more appealing to players than BF. Oh and I was talking about 100 kills without lethal killstreaks. UAV-CounterUAV-Blackbird.
    - ThelFrost September 6, 2011, 4:08 pm
    Your gonna hit a tree from 1 mile away with an rpg? First a sniper will get you before you could pull it out. Second if you do hit the tree guess what...He can just move to another spot. Plus are you gonna blow up a rock while the snipers head is barely peaking out? Didn't think so. Another thing, spotting doesn't prevent camping in BF, UAV's in CoD do.

    Once again good game.
    - ThelFrost September 6, 2011, 4:12 pm
    bf is more realistic then cod first off. mainly because the maps are larger like they are in real life. bullets drop unlike cod, it takes time for bullets to get to the place your shooting (one sided aint it?), your have support when you need it, theres vehicles i dont know about you but most scremishs have more then kids running into battle guns blazing. tbh have you even played battle field i have play cod and bf and bf wins no doubt.
    - castlewarsisawsome September 6, 2011, 4:30 pm
    snipeings not as easy has you say it is the bullet drops a shit load even on the gol, gal(the most accurate sniper in the game) and you also have to hope they dont move in the time it takes to get to them.
    - castlewarsisawsome September 6, 2011, 4:33 pm
    heres some videos i want you to watch so you can see the diffrence
    MW3 game play

    BF3 alpha game play
    - castlewarsisawsome September 6, 2011, 4:36 pm
    theyll eventually run outta spots and lol uav prevents? from the only 2 cods ive played (mw2 and BO) ghost and cold blooded....wheres your uav now? heart beat sensor? ninja in mw2 prevented that so umm camping =) and the sniper can only get you if he sees you if you fire a rpg in which the drop is very predictable you can get the tree and besides there are only sooo many trees you can climb on in bc2
    - xxkisamexx September 6, 2011, 6:28 pm
    So your gonna destroy something that cant be blown up in BF aka a rock or metal structure? Because thats where most people snipe from...not trees or destroyable buildings. Oh and most people don't use Ghost and especially not Cold Blooded. And even with those two perks there is still less camping in CoD. Oh and the game modes are 20x better and there is a ton more customization.

    Good Game.
    - ThelFrost September 7, 2011, 5:56 am
    I know about the bullet drop and stuff and sniping is still retardely easy in BF. Unlocked everything in the recon kit and the M24 is better than the GOL because of the marks on the crosshair. GOL looks better though.
    - ThelFrost September 7, 2011, 5:58 am
    A fair player doesnt rage :) also mw3 now has spotting in it
    - gamma935 September 7, 2011, 9:30 am
    BC2 influence =)
    - xxkisamexx September 7, 2011, 11:02 am
    you can be seen on a rock and metal structure isnt same color as gillie but i agree with you battlefield does need more game modes oh and on battlefield you can see where bullets come from especially sniper bullets if they miss and when they kill you in core mode you see where they are
    - xxkisamexx September 7, 2011, 11:05 am
    ....there was spotting in BC1 :) also they pretty much had UAV which is a simpler version of spotting
    - gamma935 September 7, 2011, 11:46 am
    ddnt play bc1 because to many revews says it wasnt good
    - xxkisamexx September 7, 2011, 11:49 am
    its pretty damn good actually try it
    - gamma935 September 7, 2011, 11:55 am
    tbh i use the gol so much i can take guess shots and have a 80% chance of hiting
    - castlewarsisawsome September 7, 2011, 12:11 pm
    So what your trying to say is that in CoD you completely blend in with your surrounding? Oh and you can see where bullets come from in both games, not to mention it shows up on radar when someone shoots in CoD.
    - ThelFrost September 7, 2011, 4:35 pm
    unless you have a silencer which doesnt show up and no but in battlefield its possible to camouflage in
    - xxkisamexx September 7, 2011, 5:00 pm
Related Posts